Facing a New World Disorder

This year has barely begun and already we find ourselves facing a dangerous world in which old norms and rules are changing or disappearing rapidly. We have yet to realize what the ramifications will be of what is taking place, not just for our own country but for all countries, irrespective of geography, economic stability, and political leadership.

A piece in the Washington Post in December shared a speech by Ishaan Tharoor on behalf of the World Food Program USA. It began like this. “A troubling dynamic seems to be shaping global politics. Humanitarian crises are surging as the support systems and international cooperation required to address them  are failing.”

Tharoor cite s a report by the International Rescue Committee, which chose the theme “The New World Order” for its 2026 report which illuminates unimaginable and growing crises in at least twenty countries already facing huge humanitarian crises.  These crises are directly connected to shifting global politics that will affect every one of us in one way or another because of increasing conflicts, and their impact, resulting in crises that are no longer local. These critical situations will pose the threat of wars driven by international power plays, the report says, citing “the growing importance of profit over protection in the world’s conflict zones.”

Tharoor adds that “we now have a case of disorder as the defining anchor of the global system. He worries about an “anarchic form of globalization without rules,” and an “age of impunity” that includes the loss of legal rights and ignores laws, including those related to war.

The U.S. actions in Venezuela are a sign of what could happen, in part because of growing impunity for world leaders, including Donald Trump and his attempts to interfere with Columbia, Cuba and Greenland for starters. Who knows what he plans to do in other countries. It’s clear already that the breakdown of national systems and international relationships are leading to chaos and possible anarchy which has huge implications. Analysts are already worrying about China taking over Taiwan, Putin taking over Europe, and Trump taking over several countries in Latin America while eying countries in the Middle East. Talk about a new world order in which oligarchs and dictators take over the world and fascism prevails.

The idea of a revised world order is not new. At the end of the second World War, for example, Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Stalin met in Yalta to consider the postwar reorganization of Germany and Europe which had significant implications for other regions of the world. Some analysts suggest that the idea of colonization became an issue there.

Politicians, academics, and economists have debated the idea of a world order historically and long before Yalta. It’s just that it seems terrifying in today’s global political landscape. The possible collapse of the NATO alliance is now real. That alliance has kept us safe from global disasters for nearly eighty years.  If it collapses, every country will be on its own should wars proliferate in every region of the world. It’s a stunning and frightening thing to contemplate.

The term as it’s being used now already suggests a significant and dramatic shift in the global balance of power, political thought, economic justice, food security, legal rights, and other issues that affect daily life. Migration, immigration, education, scientific advances, and access to healthcare are already threatened.

There are important lessons to be learned from the past. These lessons require qualified and humane leaders and advisors who can view the world as a global community through the lens of social justice, human rights, and a sustainable planet. That’s a tall order and it’s no secret that the three great powers right now - China, the U.S., and Russia - have leaders devoid of a commitment to peace, equity, rules of law, and social democracy. 

In addition to them, personal ambitions and corruption among their powerbroker acolytes play a large part in the idea of a new world order which makes a revised world order seemingly impossible.

But more than ever the need for global cooperation on myriad issues is vital because issues like climate change, pandemics, and economic crises now transcend national borders. Each of these potential crises highlights the limitations of a state-centric system and the need for new, negotiated, and agreed upon forms of governance. Most of us realize that alliances like that seem too difficult to achieve, but any change in governing arrangements and power dynamics among nations will ultimately require accountability, viable and effective legal structures, institutions grounded in shared progress, and guardrails if all of us are going to avoid a catastrophic future.

As historian and social critic Arthur Schlesinger once said, “We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.” But we can still hope and try to affect a likely new global order that calls for and is grounded in honesty, genuine collaboration, and a commitment to survival no matter who we are and where we inhabit our shared world.

                                                             # # #

Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, Vt.  www.elayne-clift.com

Looking Back in Gratitude

 In 1964 Barbara Streisand sang the song “People.” It began like this: “People who need people are the luckiest people in the world.” That line seemed to me to include an oxymoron: People who need people, it seemed to me, were lonely and sad, not lucky.

 As I looked back on the troubling year that concluded just over a month ago, I realized how many of us mourned or experienced the cruelty, lack of compassion, and increasing violence we were subjected to, along with hateful rhetoric and policies that hurt so many of us. Too many of us felt helpless given the lies, gaslighting, and moral corruption leading us to a seeming abyss.

It blinded us to all the goodness and small acts of kindness surrounding us. Yes, we spoke up, protested, and participated in acts of resistance. Some of us wrote about the evil that was engulfing us as the year progressed. But we neglected to write pieces that honored the ordinary, extraordinary people whose actions generated hope, revealed kindness, caring, and communal support, and made us all feel better.

The more I thought about that, the more I felt the lyrics to Streisand’s song needed editing if they were to be relevant in these times.  I felt guilty that I had neglected to tell simple stories about good people who remind us daily about the power of good deeds and simple heroic actions.

So, in a mea culpa, I think the lyrics are a bit off base now. It’s people who help people, who hold or hug them in various ways, who are the kindest people in the world. As I was contemplating this, an abundance of human-interest stories started showing up on social media that reminded me of the goodness of human connection and caring, even when offered in small ways.

Suddenly I wanted to thank just some of the people who made this a better world in 2025.  Many of the stories I saw on videos or read about on social media moved me to tears, others to smiles.  There was the bus driver who stopped his bus to lift a disabled woman into the bus and seat her
gently before he folded her retrieved wheelchair and set it next to her locked, and ready to go..

Then there were the police officers who bought a kid on their beat a new bike when his couldn’t be fixed. Or the two cops – a male and a female – who rescued a small child who’d been abandoned in an empty house. Before calling for help, they sang to her, cuddled her, and gave her a stuffed animal she embraced. I suspect that child will recall those two people when her full story is told years later.

There were videos of irate clergy, store clerks, voracious food vendors, feisty women, and brave street witnesses who successfully shooed away ICE bullies in heroic ways, despite knowing that they could be in trouble.

Stories about teachers and school administrators, medical personnel, fierce mothers and fathers, and persistent grannies were matched by men and women who saw a need for help in grocery lines and pulled out their wallets with a smile. Similarly, there were waitstaff in diners who served food to families who looked hungry without presenting a tab. I wanted to give each of these people Emotional Emmy Awards. 

Stories like this are all around us.  Here’s one example posted by someone on the organization Upworthy’s website.

“One time, my dad and I were leaving the grocery store around Christmas time and there was a guy outside asking for money to buy some stuff for his kids. My dad asked him if he could give him groceries instead of money, and the guy said yes, so my dad gave him one of everything we bought. My dad hadn't gotten his paycheck because the company he worked for was going through a tough time, but he didn't care, he saw an opportunity to help someone, and he did. Another time, he gave 50 bucks to a guy who said he needed to buy medicine for his kids. I said he was probably going to spend the money on alcohol or something, but my dad said, 'whether he was lying or not says something about HIS character, but hearing someone in need and choosing not to help when I have the means to says something about mine.' I never "forgot that.”

Those folks exemplify everyday people who make a difference because of their kindness, compassion, and generosity, and they stand with major philanthropists like MacKenzie Scott, Melinda French Gates, Oprah Winfrey, Dolley Parton and Taylor Swift, and their male counterparts.

I wish I could share my gratitude with every person who acts with kindness, no matter their social status, this year and every year. The song “People” ends like this: “But first, be a person who needs people.” I would end with this: First, be a person who helps people.  

As Upworthy puts it, just “Do good recklessly!” You won’t regret it.

A Plethora of Pardons and a Personal Ask

Given the numbers of pardons the president has granted in his second term it seems like a good idea to ask for pre-emptive forgiveness for any crimes of conscious I may commit.  The president is so happy to pardon people I figure my chances are pretty good that I won’t end up in jail for very long. Here’s a partial list of my pardon plea for the president.

Pardon me for hating that you released the likes of George DeSantos, Rudy Guliani, Steve Bannon, your political and financial allies, dubious celebrities, and notorious criminals, like Juan Orlando, the former President of Honduras, who was convicted of drug trafficking charges and sentenced to 45 years in U.S. prison while likely fishermen in the Caribbean are murdered. Is Ghislaine Maxwell next?

Pardon me for being upset that more than 1,600 people who were charged or convicted of federal criminal offenses, including those who got a blanket pardon even though they took part in the notorious insurrection that took place at the Capital, were granted clemency.

Pardon me for being desperately upset because 25 people have died in ICE custody or for weeping when I hear stories of traumatized children being separated from their parents and held in ICE detention indefinitely. I can’t bear seeing kids as young as three years old being forced to sit before a judge in immigration court before being sent God knows where.

My heart also breaks for the women in detention facilities that are more like concentration camps, mourning the loss of their children while being subjected to sexual abuse, and the pregnant women who are denied vital healthcare and basic nutrition along with clean drinking water or are forced to labor in shackles.  

As if that weren’t bad enough it’s sickening for anyone to be fed warm-riddled food, or to  sleep on the floor,  if sleep is possible with lights blaring 24 hours a day, or to use dirty showers if you can get one, or toilets that lack privacy.

This is just one of many testimonies about what detention life is like, reported by an advocacy group in Texas on CNN. “Families tell us that children are weak, crying because they are hungry and have limited access to clean drinking water, or can’t get medical help, even if they faint. Mothers have called it a prison and a living hell.” As Occupy Democrats posted on Facebook in December, “The war on terror has truly come home. Now we have dozens of Abu Ghraibs in our own backyards.”

Pardon me for wishing you could understand what it is like to be told, as one mother was, that she might never see her five-year-old daughter again, as reported by ABC News. Her daughter is one of at least 600 children sent by ICE to detention facilities this year. Experts note that the severe depression and anxiety these children and their parents experience is unimaginable, describing the trauma as unspeakable loss that leads to ongoing grief. Numerous accounts like these are documented by organizations, media, and first person accounts that families and friends share. They are utterly soul destroying.

Along with all of that, I beg your pardon for wishing that the United States could avoid committing war crimes, propping up autocracies and their self-appointed dictators, colluding with genocide, and destroying the alliances we have trusted and counted on for so long because of our shared values, which are rapidly disappearing. 

Pardon me please for abhorring the disintegration of agencies that are vital to a sane healthcare system that supports a reasonable life expectancy, basic economic security, much needed social services, as well as necessary research, educational excellence, clean air and water, disaster relief, healthy food and clean water, non-nuclear proliferation and environmental integrity.

We have an endangered planet and an unstable world right now that desperately needs to recover from the faults and failures of what we are now experiencing to avoid falling into a disastrous abyss. No amount of power, privilege, or wealth will protect those who enjoy those luxuries because we are all in this together.

Pardon me for loathing the way you treat women, people of color, immigrants and those living in poverty, illness, and lost hope. How I wish we could find our way back to basic kindness, compassion, integrity, humanity, and belief in a country and a world capable of restoring hope, joy, community, and personal and political respect.

Pardon me too for suspecting that our last election was rigged and hoping that we will have an election this year that is free, fair, and devoid of machinations or cyber-interventions that could lead us further into dysfunction and worse dystopian nightmares. 

Finally, pardon me for believing that you and your acolytes and appointees are completely devoid of human emotion, clear thinking, intellectual capacity, compassion or honesty. You have revealed who you are, and people of conscience reject your destructive and often cruel nature because we know that you are incapable of change.  So pardon us all for our conscientious pleas so that we can finally rejoice when you are relegated to history.

Gendercide: Misogyny Makes a Major Comeback

In 2025 the National World War 2 Museum declared on their website that “The concept of genocide has fundamentally altered international law, history, and global geopolitics forever, transforming the way we understand mass violence in the modern world.”

The word, coined by a Polish Jewish Lawyer in response to the Holocaust, referred to a historic practice as it relates to post war actions. Derived from the ancient Greek word meaning race or tribe and the Latin word for killing, as in homicide, infanticide, and femicide, the lawyer added that “genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation. It signifies a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.” 

After the Department of Education declared women-dominated professions like nursing, teaching, social work, and other careers did not align with their definition of a “professional degree,” which “distinguishes programs that qualify for higher loan limits, not a value judgement about the importance of programs.” Tell that to any healthcare professional worthy of recognition, respect, benefits, and professional pride.

Take nursing for example. According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, “nursing is the nation's largest healthcare profession, with nearly 4.7 million registered nurses (RNs) nationwide. Of all licensed RNs, 89% are employed in nursing.”

Here’s a Facebook post by one of them.  “Can you imagine obtaining three college degrees, three national certificates, obtaining thousands of hours in clinical practice before even entering the work force, and then holding people’s lives in your hands, caring for them during the hardest moments in their lives, diagnosing and prescribing for them. And then being told that you aren’t a professional.”

The president’s recent verbal attacks aimed at women journalists reveals another disrespected sector where females often prevail.  His rants against them are staggering. They include telling a reporter to be “quiet, Piggy,” followed by calling another reporter ugly, and third one  a "terrible person."

 It seems the perfect time to coin another new word: Gendercide. By that I mean the disappearing of women from professions, public squares, politics, pulpits and tables of decision-making.  It’s pure Handmaids Tale, and it’s designed to send women back to the suburbs of post WWII where, as Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote in her 1898 book, Women and Economics, “Women were going mad all for the good of the gold ring” in her era.  Or as Betty Friedan said after WWII, they were dying from “the problem that had no name.”

The reason for disappearing women isn’t just born of ridiculous politics. It’s noteworthy that several healthcare professionals are mandated to report sexual abuse, and female reporters ask tough questions.

The problem of female oppression and dismissal or removal is even bigger.  It resides in sex assault and trafficking of women and girls, because its survivors courageously share their stories.

It’s part of the tragedy of domestic violence. The United Nations reported in 2024 that 50,000 women were killed that year because of the violence perpetrated by someone they lived with or knew.  The report noted that’s one death every ten minutes.

Child marriage is still legal in 34 states in America with some exceptions like judicial or parental approval, and the disappearance and murder of indigenous women and girls remains a silent crisis that includes homicide, sexual assault, and trafficking. On some reservations murder rates are more than ten times the national average.

The discrimination against and silencing of women have a long history and continuity that includes abuse and violence. It goes back to ancient history. Philosophers in ancient Greece and Rome believed women had no place in politics or public discourse.  Pilgrim puritanism treated women and girls harshly, demanding obedience. In colonial times girls were married by age 14 and those who weren’t wed by 25 were socially humiliated. (Even as late as the 1960s women were pitied if not married in their early 20s). How about the Salem witch trials of the 17th century. And Joan d’Arc who was burned alive because men were fiercely afraid of her.  

In Victorian times married women were the legal property of their husbands and had no control of their finances whether by owning land or inheritance. They couldn’t vote or appear in court as a witness. At the turn of the century Edith Wharton’s novels about the Gilden Age reveal these conventions for a fin de siècle generation. Later, suffragists were beaten and force-fed in filthy prisons for wanting women to vote.

Today, women who face the fear of dying or imprisonment if they have an abortion, miscarriage, or high-risk pregnancy are disposable.  Some male legislators have suggested that women who have abortions be executed.  That’s how far we’ve fallen into the legacy of patriarchy and its desperate hatred and fear of women. Whether affluent or poor, single or married, white or black/brown, we are all at risk of Gendercide - the killing of women professionally, economically, emotionally, spiritually, and physically.

In these times, we must realize the context and connection throughout women’s history and understand how it relates to our lives and our place in the world now. It only takes one nurse’s, one teacher’s, one social worker’s, one victim’s testimony to see that we need a new word: Gendercide.

We must say it, explain it, and refuse it.

A Christmas Wish List

As a child I never wrote to the North Pole hoping Santa would deliver my requests. I knew it was a long shot, but it seemed worth a try. As an adult I don’t keep To Do Lists, a Bucket List, a shopping list, or any other kind of list. 

But this year I have a list as long as my left arm.  I know it’s a long shot that any of my current wishes will be granted, but it seems worth a try and it’s at least a catharsis. And there’s so much to wish for.

For example, I wish the right-wing legislators could wake up and realize that someone they love could be among the millions of people who will be extremely ill or die for lack of healthcare and vital research that could save lives. What if it were one of their kids or grandkids or other loved ones who will perish from the lack of cancer research, or vaccines, or expert medical attention. Do they really think they are under a magic umbrella that prevents them from growing morbidity and mortality?

I wish there were enough good politicians who could save generations of kids whose learning is becoming indoctrination as curricula morphs into indoctrination.  And I wish institutions of higher education would find the courage to push the bullies back instead of burying the purpose of Socratic learning and vigorous debate.  I also wish the media could grow a spine and act like they get the importance of a Fourth Estate that shares current events and their implications honestly and without shackles.

I wish Americans would have a collective epiphany about the beauty and importance of pristine National Parks and the Arctic and Alaskan wilderness. I also wish they will resist more self-adulatory parades, ballrooms, bunkers, and monuments like the Arch d’ Triumph. I wish they would resist mightily, increasing seven million marchers to 70,000 in time for a free and fair mid-term election.  I hope they realize what we are facing and that they have the power to stop the insanity of encroaching disaster.

I wish that Americans could fight to keep agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA), USAID, the Voice of America(VOA) going as well as NPR, PBS, and cultural venues like the Smithsonian Museum, along with historical sites and monuments. I also wish the Kennedy Center and the Gilded Age ballroom would not be named after Himself.

I desperately wish that the evil being perpetrated on America’s streets against immigrants, people of color, and legally resident people, including citizens, would cease and all the wannabe warriors would be held accountable for their cruelty. The brutal militarization on our streets and in our neighborhoods and communities must end.  So should the so-called detention centers which are, in fact, concentration camps where cruelty and deprivation of food, healthcare, legal aid, and more prevail.  The cruelty extends to children, the disabled, pregnant women, and the elderly and disappeared.  How could any of us not wish the nightmare to end.

I wish that we could always remember and resist the carnage and genocide going on right now in places like Gaza, Sudan, Congo and elsewhere.

I deeply wish that we could learn to be honest, compassionate, humane, kind human beings who reject violence, barbaric practices and places, and dystopian ideals, actions and leaders. I’ve noted lately that we could learn some lessons from the animal world. Just notice how they behave in times of trouble, threats, grief, and joy.  Note how they bond with people who love them, people who save them, people who play with them, exemplified by the late Jane Goodall and others like her. (I learned in Africa what a small place we hold in the cosmos, and that we have many lessons to learn.)

So now I wonder who and where the elves are, who will work hard to fulfill this, and other necessary wish lists.   They must be out there, among us.  Would that we come together in strength, hope, solidarity, and full humanity so that we don’t have to plead again to sit on Santa’s lap, or write letters to the North Pole, or Congress, young or old.

As Albert Einstein once said, we must, "Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning," to which I would add, and not stop being a writer of wish lists.

                                                                        # # #

Elayne Clift writes and wishes from Brattleboro, Vt.  www.elayne-clift.com

Mourning the People's House

It was bad enough when the White House Oval Office was suddenly transformed into a fire sale of faux gold decorations dripping from the mantlepiece and every other available space. Before that it was an elegant room in the White House, lovingly called the People’s House, which has always been recognized as a national historic site. The “Oval” was a warm and elegant place where serious, important decisions were discussed by dignified, respected leaders and advisors with strong portfolios who realized the magnitude of the issues being addressed.  Today, sadly, it looks like a third-rate setting for a Moliere comedy.

Now comes the devastation of the East Wing. Photos of the desecration of that much loved part of the White House are a sickening metaphor for the destruction of democracy we are witnessing.  In addition to the building disappearing, some of us can’t stop wondering what happened to the artwork, furnishings, historic references and more that were housed in the East Wing.  Was it treated as debris, or simply looted before the demolition, as other dictators have done? 

Critics have compared the demolition of the historic building to “slashing a ”Rembrandt.” One of them called the East Wing “the heartbeat for more than 100 years” as first ladies worked from their offices there on important issues ranging from drug abuse to boosting literacy and preserving the White House itself. 

In an opinion editorial in Architect’s Newsletter, a columnist noted that “The East Wing historically housed the Office of the First Lady. [Now] it seems nothing was done to protect the history of women’s contributions to the presidency. By bulldozing the structure, Trump is effectively erasing women from the history of the White House.”

Roslyn Carter was the original First Lady to have an office in the East Wing. She wanted a private place to go to work where she “didn’t have to dress up and put on makeup,” she wrote in her memoir. Hillary Clinton became the determined First Lady to insist that her office be in the West Wing because she felt that her staff needed to be “integrated physically” with the president’s team. Michelle Obama worked to support military families and promote higher education for girls in poor countries from the East Wing and set a standard as a global role model. And Jill Biden, who continued teaching while serving as First Lady, advocated for cancer research and women’s health.

Historically notable, President Franklin D. Roosevelt initiated the White House movie theater in 1942 by converting a cloakroom in the East Terrace into a screening room so that he could watch newsreels during World War II. Other presidents used the theater to rehearse important speeches including the State of the Union.

The East Wing was originally known as the East Terrace in 1902 when Theodore Roosevelt was president. FDR created the East Wing as we have known it in 1942 to have more workspace during the war, and to conceal an underground bunker for the president and staff. Today some people posit that the bunker is the reason the current president wants to obscure it with a massive ballroom which, unsurprisingly, will be named The Donald J. Trump Ballroom. They suggest that the ever-paranoid president wants the bunker to be a safe, well-equipped space for him to indulge the ultra-right-wing fascist fantasies that he clings to, along with his sycophants who can be directed by their leader as he advances his autocratic regime.

 The idea of a massive ballroom, whether it is being built as camouflage or not where the beautiful East Wing once was, is obscene. It’s not only likely to be illegal, having ignored proper approvals from the National Park Service and the National Capital Planning Commission. It’s an especially heinous Gilded Age insult and anomaly in face of a government shutdown that will affect millions of Americans in numerous and terrible ways. It smacks of robber barons and “Let them eat cake.”  It’s clearly a corrupt moneymaker, an eyesore in the landscape of Washington, and a symbol of the narcissism that is tearing us apart.

No wonder historians, preservationists, art lovers, architects, and ordinary Americans are distraught, not only for the loss of this historical building, but for the lack of transparency, the lying about funding, the underlying corruption, and its implications – all of which the president chooses to call “manufactured outrage.”  The travesty of such narcissism is stunning.

 The bottom line is that a ballroom monument to oneself has no place in the People’s House, now or ever. It’s time to insist that such acts of ego be stopped.

                                                             ###

 Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, Vt.  www.elayne-clift.com/blog

Why Gen Z Gives Me Hope

 While researching what Gen Z means, I had to understand the generation that was born between the 1990s and 2010.  I learned that they succeed Millennials and precedes Gen A (Alpha). Thankfully there’s a quote for every generation. This one, which originated with Walt Disney, seemed illustrative of Gen Z: “The Way to Get Started is to Quit Talking and Begin Doing.” Gen Zers want to act vs. eternally debating or studying issues related to governance.

I became interested in understanding this cohort because they seem to be showing up everywhere in political studies and generational discourse. What I learned gave me hope. For example, a study conducted this year by Tufts University about Gen Z Americans and democracy was enlightening.

The study explained that “Young Americans represent both the present and future of political leadership and participation in the United States, despite the current dissatisfaction with democracy in the United States. There is an overwhelming consensus among young people that democracy itself is fundamentally valuable; a majority have strong commitments to its core principles.”

The study points out that Gen Zers have grown up during a troubling time, and not just in American life. They have experienced a global pandemic, economic instability, major political shifts, increases in school shootings, activist movements related to racism, climate change, and the rise of social media and digital platforms as means of primary communication. 

Those factors don’t mean that people born between 1990 and 2010 are a monolithic generation. But their diversity, digital connection, education, and aspirations provide them with a collaborative identity, similar experience, and often an agreed upon ideology that informs the unique ways that they approach democracy.

AI helped me understand this generation. On my first search for more information the first thing to pop up online was a helpful list of key differences between Gen Z and prior generations. They include such facts as these: Gen Zers are “Digital Natives,” having never lived in a world without the internet. They are more cautious about economic matters with a view to securing their futures. They are prone to anxiety and stress given the pressures of daily life and political uncertainty. They also value authenticity, transparency and interpersonal relationships and feel globally connected in ways that helps them explore interesting career paths. To be succinct, they live in a uniquely modern world involving innovation, participation, and engagement in entirely new ways.

I wanted to write about Gen Z, not only because they show promise for the future when our current political nightmare ends, but because there are signs that this generation is already capable of making the world a better place for everyone, no matter what country they live in.

Recently, examples have been written about Gen Z efforts and actions in other countries that reveal a commitment to social justice, humanitarian governance, and  competent, compassionate, humane leadership by politically astute emerging leaders ready to work for the principles upon which our own country was built. The countries where activism is happening, and working are diverse and widespread.

In a string of articles showcased by apnews.com Gen Z activity in several countries, including Madagascar, where young protesters took to the streets to demonstrate for safe, reliable water and electricity across the country, and an end to corruption. Their actions led to the president dissolving the government. In a public speech he declared that the protesters’ demands were heard, as part of an apology for the failure of his government. Talk is cheap, but the protests clearly had an impact.

In Morocco, over a dozen cities saw young people using social media to mount a movement aimed at improvements in public health and education systems that authorities couldn’t ignore. Again, corruption was an umbrella theme aimed at political parties. In Kenya GenZ protests against police brutality and poor governance erupted throughout the country commemorating similar protests a year ago to oppose tax hikes. Current unrest in Peru was focused on the country’s pension system, and other youth movements took place in Indonesia and the Philippines.   

These examples are not just about idealistic youthful protests that will go nowhere. They are a distinct sign that a generation of young people have had enough political abuse and corruption worldwide. They are ready and willing as one protester said, “to get our nation[s] back.”

Historian Timothy Snyder, wrote a recent Substack post about “Youth Protest in Serbia” especially for. American readers.  In it he states that “Protests have to do with a basic concern with the rule of law. This is why it’s so annoying when photos in our media are tagged as ‘anti-government protests.’ People in Serbia are protesting for good government!”

He points out that the protests there were student-led but coordinated with the public. They included various actions that needed to be taken and articulated specific demands.  Community and sectoral coordination were important while people were urged to participate in governance. In other words, the protests were strategic, important, and productive, not random acts of ire.

It seems to me that Gen Z is learning, preparing, and waiting to take us into a sensible, sane, democratic future. It won’t be soon, or easy, but there is promise in their protests. Gen Zer Greta Thunberg helps sound an optimistic note.  “Being young is a great advantage, since we see the world from a new perspective and we are not afraid to make radical changes.”  I welcome her enthusiasm, courage, and world view.

                                                             # # #

Can Democracy Prevail and Thrive?

Two centuries ago, an obscure Scotsman named Alexander Fraser Tyler observed that “a democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government.” Yet here we are, nearly 250 years into America’s experiment with a government “of the people, by the people, for the people,” as Abraham Lincoln proclaimed in his Gettysburg address. Sadly, now Tyler’s idea that democracy fails when “the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury,” is upon us.

I’ve been pondering how we got here so quickly and asking myself some questions. Is democracy failing in America and in many other countries because of corruption for personal gain? (Looks like it.) Can democracy survive, thrive and prevail anywhere? What does democracy depend upon? Is the idea of democracy a misconception or myth? How is it so easily overthrown? Why are threats to democracy growing?

According to the United Nations the number of countries moving toward authoritarianism has more than doubled in recent years as polarization increases “to toxic levels” while pluralism declines and autocratic leaders take control of countries by fostering misinformation, media censorship, and increasingly repressive civil and human rights. Why has that been happening? This led to my remembering the history of democracy and then to considering another form of governance that seems to work better than ours.

As I learned in school democracy is rooted in ancient Greece followed and altered by the Roman Republic. Both systems led to changes that grew complicated. In Greece democracy fostered the idea of citizen participation in governance but limited it to free men. The Romans went a bit further, adding limited election of representatives.  Later, in medieval times, institutions added more liberal ideas like the English parliament’s Magna Carta in 1215, which limited the power of monarchs and gave some rights to various classes of people. That led to the idea that citizens should have certain rights when it came to how they were governed. When the American and French revolutions occurred the idea of human rights, though still limited, became widespread, and began to include more people in the working class, including women.

The idea of democracy relies on two principles: Individual autonomy and Equality. These two values resonated and made democracy popular, but putting those two ideas into practice proved to be complicated.  Ultimately it led to the idea of majority rule. Today the idea of “representative democracy” is a framework that offers “freedom of thought, expression, religion, and peaceful assembly.”

Social democracies take these rights further. They call for governments to provide social and economic rights to all, including education, healthcare, fair pay, and pensions. Proponents of this ideology, which have been successful in Scandinavian countries and some constitutional democracies in Europe, have proven to respect the fundamental ideas of autonomy, equality, and human rights.  It’s a system that has been proven to work well. Citizens are happy with such a humane form of governance and leaders are respected, trusted, and appreciated. It’s important to emphasize here that democratic socialism is not communism, a frequent trope that conservative and powerful elected leaders and their followers employ to convince others that it’s a dangerous system of governance.  In reality it’s a system that works and keeps countries safe and sane.

Our Constitution, written in 1789, begins with “We the People,” meant to capture the foundational principles that the government derives its power from the consent of the governed, ”for whom it serves. But democracy is not guaranteed. As some scholars say, it is still an experiment.  In 1947 Winston Churchill noted that “it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have tried from time to time.”

This brief history is important because we urgently need to recognize and resist our current and evolving system of government under the current administration, which is far from upholding the Constitution, the rule of law, human rights, and a viable and compassionate worldview. We are clearly living in a growing state of fear, shock, and illegal maneuvers that defy and threaten democracy while rapidly becoming a totalitarian state ruled by oligarchs and a dictator.

Unless you’ve escaped that or witnessed it, it’s hard to imagine what it is like, but a look at the Nazi playbook in Germany reveals the horror of those regimes.

Globally autocracies are growing exponentially. In some instances, they move to dictatorships by developing and refining techniques, including lies and propaganda, censorship, blackmail, and co-optation of entities including universities, media, the law, corporations, institutions and organizations that work toward and protect democracy.  Increasing, new methods of repression, indignity and humiliation are employed (e.g., Alligator Auschwitz and ICE detention centers) and strategic alliances manipulate information threatening elections.  Sound familiar?

I can’t answer the questions I’ve asked myself and I don’t know how we will emerge from this terrifying time, or how democracy can be restored and improved for the future. But I know the time has come for each of us to understand the situation, to act in our own and others’ interests, and to recognize the looming threat to our way of life. We must not only observe it, but act upon it if democracy is to prevail and thrive. We must ask ourselves hard questions in the hope that they lead us to a new and sustainable social democracy.

                                                                         # # #

 Elayne Clift writes and worries in Brattleboro, Vt.  www.elayne-clift.com    

Pushing Back: Brava to Women Warriors Who Stand Up to Bullies

"The days of sweeping this under the rug are over. We survivors say no more. [We are] no longer weak, [we are] no longer powerless and [we are] no longer alone.”

When Anouska De Georgiou, a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell’s bottomless abuse, stepped to the podium at the U.S. Capital on a hot day in September and spoke those words, supported by a sisterhood of women who told their stories, the decades of silence gave way to the truth about unimaginable crimes.  Undeterred by a flyover meant to obscure what they were saying didn’t phase them.  Nor did the fear of retribution.  They were on a mission, and nothing was going to stop them. 

It was a milestone event that illustrated the power of women who stand up to bullies with courage and conviction. The women who spoke and rebutted the accusation that the event was “a hoax,” modeled with great dignity and oration that the time has come when women in all walks of life have had enough. In speaking truth to power they deserve our respect and gratitude.

They are part of a larger sisterhood that is spreading throughout every corner and sector of society “fired up and ready to go.”  They form a choir of voices that insist on truth, accountability, and consequences when called for. They will not stop pushing back against the bullies who demean them, discard them, and disavow their rights.

They are in good and inspiring company. They stand on the shoulders of slaves, suffragists, and lots of other women who told the truth about their lives.  Sojourner Truth was one of them. Her speech “Ain’t I a Woman,” delivered to a room full of 19th century misogynist men, rocked the room with her oratory. Alice Paul and her suffragist friends modeled speaking truth to power to get the vote, and writers like Virginia Woolf, Audrey Lorde, and Carolyn Heilbrunn are just a few examples of women who used their literary voices to support women who refused to be ignored or silenced.

In this moment there are women in every sector of society who refuse to be quiet. Among them are three women on the Supreme Court who fire back at their conservative colleagues when they empower a wannabe dictator. Justice Ketanji Jackson Brown stands out among them. Known for choosing her words carefully she doesn’t mince words. She has accused the  majority of favoring “the creation of a zone of lawlessness within which the executive has the prerogative to take or leave the law as it wishes,” adding that the majority poses a “profound “danger to the country.” Her colleagues, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, are no wallflowers either. Neither are the judges in lower courts who have tried their best to keep the House of Trump in check.

Among them are Roberta Kaplan who helped E. Jean Carroll win a huge victory over the president for sexual abuse, Letetia James, the attorney general of New York who is standing up to Donald Trump, and Tanya Chutkin, who serves as a U. S. district judge for the District of Columbia. She vigorously refuted the president’s attempt to be shielded from prosecution when he argued that his actions fell within his duties as commander-in-chief.

Then there are the women warriors in Congress, past and present, who never failed to speak truth to power in amazing ways. Barbara Mikulski (D- MD), Pat Schroeder (D-CO) and Corie Bush (D-MO) were among them, and of course Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Kamala Harris (D-CA) have made their mark. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-NY) are also among the sisterhood making a difference.

Women at the state level are equally vociferous. Ever watch the Attorney General of Colorado, Jena Griswold?  Or the governor of Massachusetts, Maura Healey, along with the mayor of Boston, Michelle Wu. The governor of Maine, Janet Mills, is someone to watch, along with the two women running for governor of their states, Mikie Sherill (NJ) and Abigail Spanberger (VA).

Some of the best women warriors remain nameless but wonderfully effective. There are multitudes of women who organize marches or sit-ins, fight like fury for gun control, quit good jobs, run for local office, and speak out at town halls because they won’t accept corruption or political chicanery.

Women journalists, historians, writers, artists, social justice organizers and advocates like Tarana Burke, founder of the Me-Too movement, are also women who speak truth to power.  Ida Tarbell wrote about corporate greed in the early 20th century, Ida B. Wells exposed the evils of slavery, and Nellie Bly, went underground to expose what happened to women in asylums.  More contemporary women writers and artists continue to expose the truth of women’s lives, enabling others like those who stood on the Capital steps to release their rage and translate it into action.

Today’s women are as committed and courageous as those who bore witness at the Capital and demanded accountability and reform.  Brava to every one of them, and to those they have inspired to speak their truth and to continue using their voices until justice prevails.

We owe them all a debt of gratitude.

Why Civilized Nations Embrace Art, History, and Culture

It wasn’t bad enough when the president took over the Kennedy Center.  It got worse when he signed an executive order in March that accused the Smithsonian Institution of being influenced by a “diverse, race-centered ideology” because of an exhibit at the Smithsonian American Art Museum. The exhibit noted that race was a factor in “maintain[ing] systems of power, privilege, and disenfranchisement.” The solution, the president concluded, was to rewrite U.S. history, as New York Times essayist David Firestone said.

Subsequently Trump ordered the Interior Department to remove descriptions from national monuments and parks that “inappropriately disparaged Americans past or present” and instead focus on the “greatness of our nation (as he sees it) and the achievement of the American people.”

Further, the president told the Smithsonian Secretary, who oversees all operations of the Institution, that he was launching “a comprehensive internal review of selected Smithsonian museums and exhibitions” in time for next year’s 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

The review was said to be a “constructive and collaborative effort” that addresses the “curatorial process, exhibition planning, and ”narrative standards.”  It’s interesting to note that museums to be especially scrutinized address African American history and culture, Native American history and culture, and the National Portrait Gallery (who’s in, who’s out). These are among the most popular and highly visited museums in the Smithsonian system.  A Phase Two part of this “constructive effort” is planned. One can only wonder what’s next?

This is heartbreaking because the Smithsonian Institution is the world’s largest museum, and education and research complex.  It encompasses 21 museums, 14 education and research centers, and the National Zoo. Founded in 1846 by Englishman James Smithsonian, it was meant to “preserve heritage, discover new knowledge, and share our resources with the world.”

It’s no surprise that among the president’s areas of disinterest are art, history, and culture. Nor is it surprising that he wants to erase the truth of our history, the power of art, and the relevance of various cultural heritages, traditions, and rituals so that he can create them in his own image and control the narratives that are vital to our country and the world. He dislikes the connections that can be drawn from the overlap of art, history and culture. They bore him and more importantly they threaten him. He senses that art can be a powerful interpreter of life, build bridges, and connect different cultures that transcend barriers of language, politics, and geography.

Think about the storytelling that emerges from visual art and artifacts as they highlight social issues. Look at Norman Rockwell’s Four Freedoms, Picasso’s Guernica, refugee photography, protest art, and more.

As Nancy Reyner wrote in the New York Times, “Art has always held a significant place in society, influencing and reflecting the culture and community it emerges from. From ancient cave paintings to contemporary digital are, the impact of art is profound and far reaching.”

She adds that “art plays a crucial role in forming and expressing cultural identity. It captures the essence of a community’s belief, traditions, and experiences preserving them for future generations,” adding that it a powerful tool for social activism.  Is it any wonder Donald Trump is terrified of art?

Then there is history as prologue. There are lots of important lessons to be learned from the past. It’s useful to know, for example, about the threat of fascism in this country as well as Hitler’s Germany, along with past and current oligarchies. It’s important to understand what happened when the stock market crashed in 1929 and how the New Deal helped the country recover from the Great Depression. Slavery and racism are fundamental to our history, and so is Native American history and culture. There’s the McCarthyism scare, the Cuban Missile crisis, the Vietnam War protests, the birth of the Civil Rights movement, the emergence of the Woman’s Movement and so much more.

History opens doors to critical context for positive or dangerous events. It helps us to have crucial perspectives that influence our values, beliefs, attitudes, assumptions, and behaviors.  History also helps us build empathy as we begin to understand a changing world by opening critical thinking about really important issues that we face – like now.

Culture is another influence that the president would like to ignore or destroy, because understanding other people’s way of life threatens autocracy. It connects various people and communities as we begin to share, learn, and celebrate our similarities together. We become aware of flawed prejudice; we overcome stereotypes and dismiss negative myths about The Other.  We begin to realize that we are no longer living in tribal villages; we’re part of a global, diverse community that enhances our country, our relationships, and our experiences when we interact in relevant ways.

Mr. Trump and his acolytes and functionaries wish they could simply disappear these truths because they threaten their power, their dysfunctional world view, and their agenda. The day will come when that agenda fails.  Perhaps we can then join the civilized nations, throughout time, that have understood and embraced the place of art, history and culture in their daily lives. They have demonstrated the extraordinary part these three humanities play in national identity, and the quality of life for their citizens. We must do the same.

                                                             # # #

 Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, Vt.  www.elayne-clift.com

Food for Thought as the School Year Begins

I remember the days when school was about to begin for another year.  Kids went to the Five-and-Dime store to buy new pencil holders, good erasers, and tablets, before carefully covering their new schoolbooks with brown paper bags from the grocery store. Sometimes we got new saddle shoes too. It was exciting, and thankfully our parents didn’t have to worry about funding cuts that would affect our school district.

What a far cry from now, when deep and damaging cuts to essential school-based programs that would affect millions of people. The recently proposed cuts were unimaginable and cruel, but not surprising given this administration’s priorities and policies.

The pending crisis in education became obvious when Mr. Trump appointed Linda Marie McMahon as Secretary of Education, with Congressional approval. A former professional wrestling promoter with a bachelor’s degree in teaching French, McMahon has  no relevant experience that qualified her for a job running a massive organization that requires management, fiscal, organizational, and policymaking expertise. She has none of those skills and appears to have no interest in education and less interest in the people who need and benefit from educational objectives, programs, and sufficiently prioritized budgets.

The trouble started when the Trump administration took steps to dramatically reduce the size of the Department of Education by firing DOE employees. When a federal judge tried to have the fired employees returned to their jobs, the Supreme Court majority blocked the order with a temporary pause.

Justice Sonia Sotomayer was joined in a 19-page opinion by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.  In it they called the court’s decision “indefensible” and wrote that it “hands the Executive the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out. The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve, but either way the threat to our Constitution’s separation of power is "grave.”

In June the Trump administration announced a seven billion dollar cut to state and local schools. Sixteen state attorneys general reacted to that cut by suing the administration for “unconstitutionally” ending over a billion dollars in mental health related grants created to help after mass school shootings.

The $7 billion in federal spending cuts for education included five important grants that fund summer and after-school programs serving millions of students nationwide. Other impacted programs included almost $4 million for migrant education, over $2 billion for professional development, almost $9 million for English-learner services, and over a billion dollars for before-and.-afterschool programs.

National education Association president Becky Pringle reacted with shock. “Withholding billions in promised federal education funding that students need, and states had planned to use to support children in their states, is a cruel betrayal of students, especially those who rely on critical support services,” adding that “Schools are already grappling with severe teacher shortages, burnout, and under-resourced classrooms.” The fact that teachers would be expected to fill the gaps in teacher shortages and classroom supplies and would be denied training is an outrage. 

To put a human face on these cuts, imagine being a migrant child who has been in school for years and now wants to graduate from high school but can’t pass the necessary academic standards. How would you like to be an educator who wants to help student achievement by furthering your training, but you are denied that opportunity. Wouldn’t you like your child’s school to have upgraded technologies like computers?  How about having literacy and other educational services available during non-school hours via after school or summer programs, particularly if you live in a rural area where schools have low performance records. These educational benefits, and necessities, help kids reach their potential and shape their futures.

Keeping children safe and cared for outside of routine school or summer hours is another benefit derived from educational programs. It’s not hyperbole to say that investing in educational opportunities and programs make a ton of difference for families, communities, and this country’s future. 

Interestingly, the Education Department released $1.3 million in previously held grant money for after-school programs just days after ten Republican senators sent a letter begging the Trump administration to allow frozen money to be sent to states. Withholding those funds would have meant some school districts and nonprofit organizations would have had to close or drastically scale back their educational programs this fall.

In addition to the released funds paying for programs before and after the summer the release of those funds will provide childcare for low income working parents or provide childcare options in rural areas. Beyond that, children can receive help with reading and math, as well as in science and art.

In July the remaining $5.5 billion cut was restored due to growing pressure on the administration from the public and professionals. Let’s hope that continuing pressure by parents, teachers, education administrators, and others will impact the administration, and Linda McMahon, enough to care about our kids, and  realize that education in all forms is  critical for all of us.

On this and other urgent matters, we need to keep the pressure up. It obviously works!

Mourning the Loss of Public Service Media

It’s 1950 and my family has become TV owners. A console with a little black and white screen faces the couch in our tiny den, where every day we kids watch shows that seem utterly ridiculous now. But then Captain Kangaroo, Howdy Doody, The Mickey Mouse Club and Superman held our attention just like soap operas did for adults. 

We were too old to visit Mr. Rodgers Neighborhood , which was launched in 1968, although we caught glimpses of it. (I loved the character Lady Elaine).  It was a dramatic change from the silly children’s shows, thanks to Fred Rogers, and  National Educational Television (NET), which later became PBS. To this day, Mr. Rogers’ show is recognized as the forerunner to educational programming for kids that proved to be hugely beneficial to children’s development, as Sesame Street does still, adored by children and many adults.

Following PBS, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) was established in an act of Congress. Its mission, along with that of PBS, was to provide quality programming often overlooked by commercial broadcasters. It focused on education, history, culture, nature, science, public affairs, and children's content. PBS has been going strong all these years, and the thought of losing it is painful.

Thanks to the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 which President Lyndon B. Johnson signed, NPR was created by the CPB and went on air in 1971 with coverage of a Senate committee hearing on the Vietnam War. It went on to programs like Morning Edition and All Things Considered which became extraordinarily popular. As NPR grew, it reached  across the country via nationwide satellite distribution which eventually opened up bureaus around the world. It has continued for decades as it provides quality news and cultural programming along with serving as a public service to rural communities.[1]

In July the Trump administration declared that it was ending funding for CPB, which funds PBS and NPR. The Senate passed the measure supporting that goal immediately. Followers of public broadcasting, editors, and journalists were stunned, and deeply troubled, at the thought that over a billion dollars, which had been appropriated by Congress for two years, would disappear.

They realized immediately, on the heels of the disastrous floods in several parts of the country, that people who rely on public broadcasting for emergency information in rural areas could be in grave danger.  Editors feared that they could be taken off the air at a moment’s notice. Listeners panicked when they couldn’t turn on their TVs or radios for lack of electricity.  Consumers were outraged, both at the practical consequences of such a move as they realized that they were watching “freedom of the press being eroded in plain sight,” as Edward Helmore, a Guardian writer, put it in a July essay, noting that “The US media is now in a deep crisis similar to the creeping autocracy in places like Hungary and other repressive regimes.”

New York University journalism professor Adam Peneberg adds that “journalist are scared. They’re afraid of a president who would gladly crush dissent, rewrite the rules and laws, and weaponize power to punish his critics.” He asks them to “imagines a world in which your mailbox is filled with death threats, your home address is leaked online, and fake 911 calls send armed police to your door.”

In a piece called “How Will the Fourth Estate Approach Trump’s Second Term” published in January, Peneberg quotes a colleague, James Devitt. “Trump’s war on media, calling journalists ‘the enemy of the people” isn’t new. Presidents have long bristled at being held accountable.” Devitt goes on to wonder if current and future challenges to the free press could prove existential. It seems to me that we’re already there, and yes, it's frightening.

According to the German Marshall Fund of the United States, in 1787 Thomas Jefferson wrote: “Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”

That quote speaks to the vital function of public media as well as independent journalism, both of which are the foundational cornerstones of democracy.  

While the media environment is constantly changing as is the public’s diminishing trust in media sources, that trust has not waned when it comes to PBS, NPR and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Most of us still rely on their dedication to accurate, independent, fair and transparent news, sound political discourse, and factual information as well as entertainment, and exposure to cultural issues.

As Mahatma Gandhi said, “Freedom of the press is a precious privilege that no country can forego. … The Fourth Estate is definitely a power, but to misuse that power is criminal.”

I hope we can realize that we too are a powerful force; one that uses our power to ensure that truth, integrity, decency, and a democratic society prevail. The time to use that power is now.

 Author Note: CPB has announced that it will be shuting down at the end of the year.

                                                            # # #

Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, Vt. www.elayne-clift.com

[1] Informationon on PBS, CPB, NPR in paras 1-2 gleaned from AI.

SCOTUS Ignores the Law and Trades Compassion for Cruelty

Only three of them remain. They are women with integrity, refined intellect, a belief in human rights and a deep knowledge of the law. Now they mourn the betrayal of six colleagues on the Supreme Court who fail to respect the oaths they took to protect and preserve a 250-year-old document upon which our country was founded.  

One of those women is Justice Sonia Sotomayor who recently wrote, “The Government has made clear in word and deed that it feels itself unconstrained by law…free to deport anyone anywhere without notice or an opportunity to be heard. … By rewarding lawlessness, the Court once again undermines the foundational principles of [ the Constitution].”

Another is Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson who added to Justice Sotomayor’s statement regarding the migrant crisis. “The government’s so-called ‘urgency’ about gaining this access [to due process] is the mere fact it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes. Once again, this court dons its emergency responder gear, rushes to the scene, and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them.”

 Along with Justice Elena Kagan, these women have spoken judicial truth to power.

As blogger Thom Hartmann wrote, “The American people got a taste of authoritarianism wrapped in judicial robes” when in June the Court allowed the Trump administration to deport masses of immigrants to random countries from which there is no hope of return. “The Government made clear in word and deed that it feels itself unconstrained by law … By rewarding lawlessness, the Court again undermines [a] foundational principle.”  … “The decision means that a future president with dictatorial ambitions could cite this ruling to round up political dissidents, journalists, or whistleblowers and ship them off” -- to places that feel like Hell without due process – which was the law of the land before this administration.

Shame on the Supreme Court for dealing a death blow to democracy by handing the would-be-king his crown.  How are we to understand such cruelty and judicial prejudice in the Supreme Court as it destroys the rule of law, the Constitution, human rights, and the essential elements of democracy?

As all of this was happening SCOTUS limited the ability of federal judges to pause Mr. Trump’s executive orders (largely written by Stephen Miller). It considered ending birthright citizenship, which violates the 14th Amendment guarantee of such citizenship, stating that anyone born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction is a citizen. The Court sycophants pleased the president who gleefully exclaimed that “Our country should be very proud of the Supreme Court.” This issue may be revisited in the fall.

Other SCOTUS decisions have reduced the ability of lower courts to keep the White house in check.  Now everything is at stake, from shutting down Planned Parenthood to Medicaid and SNAP cuts that can’t be challenged legally while the entire judicial system breaks down. That’s how dictatorships take hold and never let go.

All of this was foreshadowed when the ACLU challenged the power of the president in the Supreme Court last year after the Court ruled that President Trump is immune from criminal liability for a set of “core” acts and decisions, including his attempt to use the Justice Department to obstruct the results of  the election.

As ACLU pointed out in its argument against that ruling, SCOTUS left to the lower courts a good deal of the work required to determine which acts and decisions were or would be immune and which would not. That opened the door for the president, or others who follow, to engage in criminal acts free of accountability. The ACLU quickly cited the Constitution’s principle that no one is above the law in the United States, including the president.  The Court found that when the president acts as an individual s/he is not immune, but it held that presidents have immunity for their official actions, even when undertaken for personal ends and criminal purposes.

 A document called “How Do Dictators Destroy Judicial Independence,” written last year by several legal scholars, underscores how dictators consolidate power to control every facet of governance.  “Dictators often target the judiciary as a key institution to manipulate. The independence of the judiciary is a cornerstone of any democratic system, serving as a check on executive power and ensuring that laws are applied fairly and impartially. Dictators see an independent judiciary as a threat and potential obstacle to their ambitions. By systematically dismantling judicial independence, they transform the courts into tools of repression, allowing them to suppress opposition, evade accountability, and entrench their rule.”

As Adam Liptak noted in a New York Times essay last month, the three women justices cited here wrote a 19-page dissent to the Court’s use of the “Emergence Docket” applied to recent Court decisions, in which they stated that, “The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve but either way the threat to our constitution’s separation of power is grave.”

The betrayals of SCOTUS with respect to the Constitution, and the future, are clear. The abandonment of fundamental rulings and rights that made this country unique is a terrible, heartbreaking blow that demands reform. Dare we hope for that reform in time to preserve our way of life?

                                                ###

Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, VT  www.elayne-clift.com

Art and Travel: Jouneying to New Places and Possibilities

Summer always reminds me of the sheer joy of traveling whether to new places, or to nearby venues or even back to favorite spots.

All my life I have disagreed with Henry David Thoreau who thought it wasn’t “worthwhile to [travel] around the world to count the cats in Zanzibar.” The joy of travel has been in my blood since I was a child when our family summer vacation was a trip to visit our Canadian family. Our favorite stops included the gorges in Ithaca, the Thousand Islands, and Niagara Falls, especially when they were lit up with rainbow colors at night.  Each of these places were natural works of art, although at the time I didn’t think of it that way.  They were simply beautiful.

Later I realized that Mark Twain, was right. Travel is “fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness.” He suggested that it “would be well if an excursion could be got up every year and regularly inaugurated.” I agreed wholeheartedly so in my early twenties I took my first solo trip to Europe eager to explore the world.

In Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum I was awed by paintings that reflected the country’s history and culture in vivid portraits and painted landscapes that brought to life the homes and people of a country I knew little about. London’s National Gallery introduced me to England’s history and the people who experienced it via exquisite art, while Paris offered an endless array of gorgeous art and sculpture. In Florence, I marveled at Michelangelo’s David and contemplated perfection in his veined hands.

It wasn’t only museums that educated me as I traveled for work and pleasure. Sometimes I saw a landscape that Anzel Adams might have photographed. Other times it was a place that became a living museum, introducing me to the culture and traditions of a country.  In Portugal wall tiles were beautiful works of art.  I visited a small Peruvian village reknown for its hand-woven tapestries. Guatemalan women wore their beautiful weaving and embroidery, and South African beaded works were worn or displayed in gift shops. 

One day in France my husband and I stopped in a gallery in the ancient town of Vesely. The owner told us that his father had sculpted an extraordinary exhibit in a park we’d seen. Hand-carved wooden figures, called The Slaughter of the Innocents, commemorated the French deaths of WWII.  He lives in Auxerre,” his son told us, next to the Cathedral.  Auxerre was our next stop and that is how we came to meet Francois Brochet, whose powerful work was moving. An elegant man with the hands of a sculptor, I loved the soulfulness of his art.  Before we parted Francois escorted us to his garden to reveal more sculptures. Pointing at the blue sky above the hedgerow, the cathedral loomed. “You see,” he said, “I don’t need to go far for inspiration. It is here in my backyard.” 

Another travel event occurred in the northern region of Romania called Bucovina, which once belonged to Ukraine, where my grandparents had emigrated from to escape early 20th century pogroms. Bucovina is known for its painted monasteries. Bible stories are painted inside and out because 15th century peasants weren’t allowed inside churches. We were staying in a host home and in the morning their English-speaking daughter took us to the village. The little houses were painted in various colors and horse-drawn carts clopped across the cobblestone streets making their way among outdoor markets. It was a live portrait full of history, culture and village life.

 An elderly woman emerged from the fog wearing a babushka, apron, and big black shoes. She looked like my grandmother whom I’d never met but had seen in pictures. I suddenly burst into tears. Here I was in what could have been the shtetl where my ancestors lived and my mother was born. So began a pilgrimage connecting me to my parents’  birthplace, for the woman in the village was our host family’s grandmother. Suddenly we too were family, eating Romanian mamalika in the kitchen, enjoying photos, and listening to stories of dictator Ceausescu time.  Our parting was emotional. I had visited somewhere I’d never imagined and experienced a living portrait of painted monasteries, village landscapes, and a family whose home might have been my ancestors.

Museums share stories that help us understand other cultures, often while providing historical context that informs our worldview, but nothing compares to the living art all around us, especially as we explore and experience new places and people.  I have been blessed to travel on every continent and each new place offers a new palate, a new picture, and a new perspective. As I grow older, I embrace those opportunities and memories.

I can’t imagine having missed it all.  Nor can I imagine how Henry David Thoreau, and others like him, consider it useless.  To my mind, Hans Christian Andersen said it best and most succinctly: "To travel is to live."

                                                            # # #

Author note: This essay is adapted from one that appeared in Artscope Magazine, May 2025.

Elayne Clift travels from Brattleboro, Vt.  Her book “Around the World in 50 Years: Travel Tales of a Not So Innocent Abroad” was published by Braughler Books in 2019.

Baby Bribery: The Height of Hypocrisy

Remember the political phrase some years ago endorsed by Republicans who called themselves “the moral majority” while critics’ responded that they were neither? Or the Democratic crie de coeur that Republicans only cared about children from conception to birth?  Well, the time has come to recall those responses.

It’s clear that the Trump administration is embracing a pronatalist position taken straight out of the Hitler playbook. Adolf rewarded women who birthed lots of Aryan children, and Donald is now embracing the idea of incentivizing women to have at least six children.

At the same time as the president blathers on about “traditional family values,” he’s on a diabolical mission to convince women to have more babies – at least six of them. If they meet that goal (and what woman would want to?) he would reward them with a $5,000 “baby bonus” – get this – reserve some scholarships for mothers who are married with children.  But wait a minute: What mother of six would have the time or energy required in the marketplace, the academy, corporations, factories, farms or elsewhere other than the kitchen and laundry room. To top off this amazing offer, he would also give them “motherhood metals.”  Who could resist that?

To support baby making he would also bump up financial support for more IVF because he claims to be the “fertilization president” and the “king of IVF.”  This delusion at the same time that women are going to jail for miscarriage and dying from lack of pre-natal and birthing care.

The fact is that laws relating to miscarriage in many states have proliferated since Roe v. Wade was overturned, despite the statistic that about 30 to 50 percent of pregnancies end in miscarriage, according to the Equal Justice Initiative. That’s a lot of women who are at risk of criminal prosecution.

The hypocrisy doesn’t stop there. The faux IVF maven and his gang of goons are simultaneously slashing every program that helps children and their families, including cuts to maternal and child health programs, the Head Start program for low-income families, childcare support, paid maternity leave, and daycare, as well as Medicaid. It’s relatively easy to increase the fertility rate, but where does protecting our progeny fit into this Draconian plan?

So much for family values. In March the U.S. Department of Agriculture cut $500 million from the Emergency Food Assistance Program and cut more than $1 billion from two programs that help food banks and school meal programs, including $660 million for schoolchildren because, they said, it was “nonessential.” Hundreds of school systems and food banks are not facing rising food prices along with food insecurity, according to a .Stateline report.

As the 19th century clergyman, Frederick William Robertson, said, “There are three things in the world that deserve no mercy: Hypocrisy, fraud and tyranny. “

This White House fits that sentiment along with being amazingly inept in making moral decisions, understanding connections or caring about them, as it continues its insane tyranny over safety nets and vital resources.  Schools, for example, are taking a big hit when it comes to government support for all the babies it wants to see born.  Fewer financial resources for schools, from early education programs through higher education, impact how those babies will grow and develop in the best possible ways.

Minnesota based Walden University, which specializes in programs related to education, cites the results of fewer resources available to schools, especially those with ill-funded school budgets. Students in these schools don’t perform as well as they could because schools can’t buy updated textbooks in a variety of fields, and updated educational technology takes a hard hit when funds are cut, along with art supplies, extracurricular activities, and transportation. Larger classrooms stand to see dozens of students with one teacher, making individualized assistance unlikely.

As educator John Dewey noted, “Education is Life Itself.”  Would that this administration realized that and valued our children enough to act like grownups in the room.  

In the health sector, the impact of Medicaid cuts on children is alarming. They can lead to fewer providers, longer waiting times, and limited access to essential services, especially for special- needs children. Support services like school-based programs or important in-home care will be curtailed, and rural communities will be hit hard by cuts that lead to health disparities. Children with disabilities will suffer reduced interventions and therapies, which will compromise their physical development and mental health. These cuts are grounded in the fact that children are often overlooked in budget debates because they have no political voice.

As Nelson Mandela said, “History will judge us by the difference we make in the everyday life of children.”  And history will also judge this administration for its hypocrisy, fraud, and tyranny along with its lack of compassion, humanity, and lack of morality.

As for bribes for babies, I wouldn’t start making any motherhood medals. 

                                                            # # #

Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, Vt. 

The Machinations Just Won't Quit

Lately, I’ve been worried about some new steps the Trump administration has in mind. There’s the gigantic Trojan horse airplane that the president is excited about. And the threat of millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as lawmakers consider changing the health care insurance program that benefits more than 70 million people nationwide, according to a Newsweek Report.

Republicans on the committee that oversees Medicaid had contemplated $800 billion in spending cuts, which largely affected Medicaid, so that the administration could increase tax breaks for the rich. The Congressional Budget Office estimated at the time that the bill could result in over 10 million people losing some coverage and more than seven million going without any insurance. Those most affected by Medicaid cuts include low-income individuals and families, the elderly, disabled, and immigrants. Amazingly, Republicans in Congress have argued for even larger cuts.

The original bill required that able-bodied adults work or volunteer for many hours a week. In a moment of generosity, the proposed bill would exempt pregnant women or anyone with a proven short-term hardship. There would also be new co-pays for those earning over a certain threshold. Medicaid recipients who make around $32,000 a year for a family of four would be required to pay $35 for some services.  That could mean a difficult decision when it’s time to buy groceries or your kids’ meds.

I’m also worried about a House bill that wants the Treasury Secretary to designate any nonprofit he choices a “terrorist supporting organization” without justification. Such nonprofit organizations would have their tax-exempt status removed without due process, according to the Americans Against Government Censorship.

As the AAGC notes, “no administration should be able to weaponize the government against their political opponents in a power grab [nor should] the federal government use its power to punish and attack any organization that stands in their way.”

In the first 100 days of his administration President Trump pursued an agenda aimed at silencing any organization that expressed views that were counter to his public policies. Churches, universities, government agencies and officials, law firms and media were subject to punishment because they spoke out against the administration’s agenda. The bullying of opponents was shocking, but it shouldn’t have been. It was all there, overtly or by inuendo in Project 2025.

There are close to two million nonprofit organizations based in the U.S. They include charities, private foundations and other types of NGOs that provide food assistance, medical care, disaster relief, educational resources, and more. If that law passes, every American would become vulnerable in a variety of ways should the multitude of programs, agencies, and funders of civil society and social justice organizations lose their tax-exempt status.

As the executive director of Americans Against Government Censorship, put it, “It’s a sad day in this country when organizations that provide critical services to their communities are under attack from their government.” It’s also a sad time when a slew of executive orders and Draconian laws devised by ignorant, selfish people make others in all walks of life feel fearful, humiliated, insecure, ill, anxious and hopeless. 

Then birthright citizenship showed up on political radar screens. On Day One of his current presidency, Donald Trump followed up on his pledge to issue an executive order ending birthright citizenship. He signed an executive order that day. The problem is that only constitutional amendments, not executive orders or legislation, can change the Constitution.

According to the ACLU and other legal scholars the president’s order is clearly unconstitutional because it  violates the 14th Amendment, which states that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” guaranteeing  that no politician can decide who among those born in our country is worthy of citizenship.

The issue loomed large recently when the Supreme Court heard oral arguments concerning Trump’s efforts to end birthright citizenship. The arguments weren’t about birthright citizenship per se. That issue in its entirety will be heard later. Instead, arguments were about the merits of the case with a focus on procedural questions. As MSNBC’s legal expert Lisa Rubin noted, the most significant moment in the hearing came when the Trump administration’s lawyer blew his case with an irrelevant statement to which Justice Amy Coney Barrett responded that it sounded like “a troubling sign of creeping authoritarianism.”

Now Attorney General Pam Bondi wants “subpoenas, court orders, and search warrants to compel” reporters to reveal information about their sources. She has said that the Justice Department “will not tolerate disclosures that undermine President Trump’s policies.” The Draconian act would overrule the PRESS Act, which had bipartisan support pre-Trump. It would have codified protections against subpoenas for reporters’ records if Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer hadn’t let the proposed Act die, according to a recent post on The Intercept.

It's obvious that further threatening legislation lies ahead. It will be up to the courts, public vigilance and protests, and pleas to Congress to end the dangerous dysfunction we are experiencing if we are to avoid the authoritarianism that already looms large.

                                                                        # # #

Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro Vermont.

A New Eugenics Wave: Trying to Make Disability and Disease Disappear

Back in the 1980s when I was a budding journalist publishing articles related to women and health while working as Program Director for the National Women’s Health Network, I had the privilege of interviewing Judy Heumann and her collaborator Ed Roberts. Judy was known by then as the Mother of the Disability Movement and Ed was called the Father of Independent Living.

Judy, who died in 2023, had contracted polio as a child who then spent the rest of her life in a wheelchair.  She was denied the right to attend school because she was considered a fire hazard at the age of five. That was the seed that led to her life’s work. Determined to work with other disabled people, she helped found the Berkeley Center for Independent Living and the World Institute on Disability with Ed, who also had polio at the age of fourteen. It left him completely paralyzed and on a respirator for the rest of his life.  Undeterred, Ed fought to attend UC Berkeley, and ultimately became the first student to use a wheelchair there, let alone a respirator.

Their stories opened my mind to justice issues as no one else had. Together Judy and Ed changed the lives of all disabled people by helping to institute laws like the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), and much more. They weren’t afraid of shocking people, and they knew how to mobilize the media. In 1990 they led a demonstration in which thousands of activists abandoned their wheelchairs and mobility aids, many of them crawling up the eighty-three steps of the U.S. Capital building. The youngest one among them was eight years old.

A recent article in The Guardian noted that the day after Donald Trump was sworn for a second term was the day that the accessibility page and all assisted living content was removed from the White House website. Live interpretation (ASL) was removed from the White House and various federal agencies too.

Additionally, words like “diversity,” “women,” “accessibility” and “disability” were listed as reason to reject grant applications at the National Science Foundation, scaring other agencies and research institutions. That was followed by the order to dismantle the Department of Education, with over 1300 employees fired, and seven regional offices were closed. Special education and rehabilitation services along with the department’s office of civil rights were affected – after Linda McMahon, Trump’s Secretary of Education, promised that those programs would not be affected.

As the Guardian pointed out, early intervention programs and post-high school transition programs, including those that help with employment for disabled workers, are being slashed. They even went so far as to scrub the Special Olympics.  Services like speech, physical and occupational therapy have been cut. So were funds for ramps and braille materials, along with the idea of preferential seating and more. Some have called the treatment of disabled people “the canary in the coal mine.”  After all, Hitler started his elimination campaigns with disabled people. 

What’s happening here now smacks of Eugenics, which was first passed in the U.S. in 1907 in Indiana. Eugenics laws targeted disabled people in schools, institutions, and jails.  Sterilization was mandated for “criminals, idiots, rapists, and imbeciles” in the state. Another law passed that year called for compulsory sterilization for those with “heredity diseases, which included deafness, blindness, epilepsy, and a lot of other conditions. In 1930s Germany mandatory abortions were also required if a parent had one of the identified conditions.

In the U.S. it remains legal in at least 31 states and Washington, D.C. to forcibly sterilize people because of a 1927 SCOTUS decision that upheld sterilization in Virginia. That decision has never been overturned.

This is the stuff of nightmares, and horror stories. It’s a shameful piece of American history, and a frightening example of what can happen when dictators and oligarchs take over a country and massacre their laws, ignore their courts, and extort institutions of learning, law, and civil rights. It’s beyond Draconian and Dystopian.  It’s just plain evil.

Alongside these travesties it bears illuminating what is happening at the same time in the health sector.  An April post on Bluesky by someone named Josh Marshall made the case that “most of the country has little idea of what has happened at NIH or through it the entire ecosystem of biomedical research in the U.S.” Marshall reminds us that cancer research has been put back decades along with other research about treatments and cures for other illnesses that lead to disability or death.

“It’s real, and it’s happened so quickly that most of the country doesn’t know it yet [including] the biomedical research world outside of NIH. … The prospect of more lifesaving cures and treatments [is] bleak,” Marshall says. So is life for disabled or otherwise comprised Americans, including children, elders, and those with chronic illnesses or disease, all because of political extremism led by totally incompetent people with no relevant experience or an ounce of empathy.

The canaries in the coal mines are sounding alarms. We must stay alert and actively resist in whatever ways we can. Our lives and our loved ones depend on us.  As Dylan Thomas famously said, “Do not go gently into the night.  Rage, rage against the dying of the light.”

                                                                # # #

Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, Vt. 

Turbulent Times Redux

Some time ago I wrote a piece about my fear of flying.  It was after reading Erica Jong’s 1973 novel Fear of Flying, which had nothing to do with flying. But it had a bit in it about her own fear of flying that captured my anxiety.  Her description of trembling on takeoff mirrored mine.

Whenever I think about boarding a hunk of silver metal that weighs more than a large beluga whale that’s about to hurtle across the hopefully vacant sky, “my fingers (and toes) turn to ice,” she wrote. “My stomach leaps upward into my rib cage, the temperature in the tip of my nose drops to the same temperature in my fingers, and my heart and the engine correspond as we attempt to prove again that the laws of aerodynamics [will save us].”

My pre-flight anxiety is the worst. It starts the minute I book a flight. But I never give in to my fear of flying because I love to travel, and like most of us I try to believe that “it won’t happen to me.” 

But what’s been occurring in aviation recently has ratcheted up my anxiety big time, especially because I will be flying a few weeks after this writing, and again a few months after that.  It doesn’t help that both trips involve several flights, two of which are in very small planes, and two of which are transatlantic, which means there’s nowhere to land in an emergency unless you can make it to Iceland.

Now my anxiety is over the top because of all the recent accidents, one of which resulted in casualties, along with near-misses, mechanical failures, and the possibility of FAA being privatized while lots of air traffic controllers are being fired although there’s already a shortage of these experienced people who keep planes from crashing into each other.  (Experts have been saying for years that near-misses on runways are more common than the traveling public may realize.)

Then there’s the cluster of potential disasters taking place in aircraft cabins which appear to be increasing. Some chilling stories include a man who tried to stab a flight attendant on a cross-country flight and a flight attendant who had her nose broken by an unruly passenger. Cabin crews have reported other physical attacks as well as sexual harassment.

It’s also clear that climate change and global warming have played a part in increased episodes of severe turbulence. The research is clear: Earth’s warming is increasing the risks of dangerously bumpy flights. Last year thirty-six passengers on a flight to Hawaii were injured and a transatlantic flight had to make an emergency landing at Dulles International Airport in Virginia. Incidents like these are ratcheting up as the number of flights increases and the weather makes us all vulnerable to weather conditions.

I’ve probably flown hundreds of flights all over the world for work or pleasure and mostly things have been fine. But I’ve had some close calls. Flying over the Andes once the turbulence was so intense I wondered if I’d be forced to eat survivors as we waited for rescue. I also had a “close as it gets” landing in Honduras when two aircraft rounded a mountain simultaneously while trying to land.

Now I have a new thing to worry about.  I’m wondering if I’d be allowed back into the United States or whether I’d be handtied, held for hours (hopefully without my head being shaved) and disappeared into a place like El Salvador.  That’s because it’s no secret that I am a left-leaning journalist, an activist, and pro-Palestinian advocate. I’m also a feminist and liberal – words on the don’t use list.  My anxiety grows daily thanks to Donald and his sidekicks.  So does my husband’s, a green card holder.

When I’m rational I realize that air travel is statistically safer than getting in your car. I know that like cars, airplanes are, for most of us, a necessary part of modern life. Still, there is something that kicks in when I board an airplane, and the door is sealed by a gatekeeper on a terra firma ramp. As the engines rev, and safety instructions, which are pretty useless, are demonstrated, I think of Erica Jong, who admitted that “constant vigilance” was her motto. “I keep concentrating very hard, helping the pilot fly that 250 passenger !#+@!” she said.  These days I relate to that more than ever.

A comedian once captured my own aerophobia (a real word). It gives me something to laugh at when the going gets rough.  “"My fear of flying,” he shared, “starts as soon as I buckle myself in and then the guy up front mumbles a few unintelligible words then before I know it, I'm thrust into the back of my seat by acceleration that seems way too fast and the rest of the trip is an endless nightmare of turbulence, of near misses. And then the cabbie drops me off at the airport."

So, here's to all the newly fearful travelers as we buckle up. Long may we have smooth flights to our destinations and return trips home, safely, without incident, or white knuckles.

                                                            # # #

Elayne Clift writes, and worries about flying, from Brattleboro, Vt. 

The Power and Promise of Resistance

It’s become clear that the time to act against political evil is now because this is an extraordinary moment in our history: We stand to lose the democracy we have taken for granted. Luckily, we are not new to resistance. We’ve done it before, and we’ve learned lessons from the past. But there are new lessons to be learned.

As Erica Chenoweth, a political scientist at Harvard, points out, we have a history of resisting authoritarianism. Pro-independence colonists organized campaigns refusing to buy British goods and refused to abide by laws that required colonists to export raw materials to Britain. They defied other orders from Britain when they mounted the Boston Tea Party and undertook other  rebellious acts

More recently we have realized success by resisting modern travesties. The civil rights movement achieved desegregation with noncooperation campaigns like the Montgomery bus boycotts, lunch counter sit-ins, strikes, business boycotts, marches, demonstrations and the power of Martin Luther King Jr.’s oratory along with legal action. The women’s movement of the 1960s that continues today changed social norms and misogynist legislation, and organized resistance helped end the Vietnam War.

Lessons from the past are instructive. For example, Plato wrote that Socrates risked “all consequences in preference to becoming a partner in their iniquitous deeds.” Perhaps that inspired him to write The Republic in 380 BC in which he envisioned a just society in which “The best and most just of all rulers are those who are most reluctant to govern, while the worst and most unjust are those who are most eager. “

            Aristophanes wrote Lysistrata, a play in which the women of Athens occupied the Acropolis and went on a sex strike until the men agreed to make peace. Lysistrata stated that even if I was born a woman, don't hold it against me if I manage to suggest something better than what we've got now."

             Gandhi’s Quit India campaign, a unifying rallying cry for civil disobedience spread quickly and culminated in his 1930 Salt March which inspired the march on Washington in 1963 and the Selma to Montgomery march two years later. “Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless or corrupt”, King wrote in his Letter from a Birmingham Jail, which included his famous statement that “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

             There are many ways to resist, and literature, music, and art have played their part. A strong artistic protest against injustice occurred in the Baker Library at Dartmouth College in Hanover, NH in the 1920s when Mexican artist José Clemente Orozco painted frescoes that depict the history of the American continent from the immigration of native peoples in prehistoric times to the arrival of the Europeans and their impact on native civilization.  Diego Rivera also used murals as a way to resist tyranny.  He called Orozco the conscience of his generation because of his intentional speaking out about things without fear of the consequences.  

            Music also rails against injustice. The Beatles, Arlo Guthrie, Helen Reddy, and many more recognized the importance of resistance through protest songs which still resonate today.

              American writers wrote books of resistance about political and social issues, mobilizing public opinion, advocating for the persecuted and marginalized, celebrating resisters, making space for direct action, aimed at a way forward. Protest literature made its mark with books like John Hersey's Hiroshima, a masterful anti-war book. Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring woke people up to environmental issues, and James Baldwin’s essays in The Fire Next Time explored the American civil rights movement while Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee chronicled the violence of America's systemic destruction of Native America’s indigenous peoples and their culture.

            This cultural context is enlightening but as Erica Chenoweth points out “today’s political terrain calls for a more muscular movement strategy” centered on economic resistance given that our future elections are at risk. She agrees with other strategists that withholding labor and purchasing power along with strikes or slowdowns, are both effective methods of resistance.

I personally advocate for a national strike day, and a Project 2028 document (which needn’t be 900 pages long) that blasts Project 2025 and states specifically what new leadership would do to roll back Trump travesties and makes clear what antidotes will restore civil and human rights.

Another resistance tool for pressuring policy makers is employing a proven communication strategy aimed at raising awareness, increasing knowledge of what’s at stake, addressing attitudes, practices and beliefs and conveying a visionary, achievable future. Such a strategy calls for acting vs. reacting and focusing on “target audiences” by meeting them where they are and hearing what they say and think.

When stories are localized and opinion leaders and trusted change agents are in partnership with the media the results can be amazing.  I know because I worked internationally on a successful communication project that involved media advocacy methods vs. political public relations. It saved lives. Sadly, our politicians have not realized the potential and efficacy of well-researched and designed messages that rely on multiple ways to convey information and inspire action.

Add that to the mix and Erica Chenweth could be right. “Americans seem to be rediscovering the art, science, and potency of noncooperation, combined with a robust protest capacity and legal action, [that suggests] resistance against Trump’s agenda in America is not only alive and well. It is savvy, diversifying and probably just getting started.”

Let’s hope she’s right.

                                                            # # #

Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, Vt.

The Price of Purges

Imagine this: A historic hurricane barrels towards Florida’s Gulf Coast, or massive fires move quickly through California, or a giant tornedo tears through the Midwest. But there is no way to know these disasters are coming because the Trump administration has fired hundreds of workers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the agency that tracks and monitors weather events that threaten massive numbers of people who live in susceptible areas.

There is no help during or after these disasters occur because the Trump administration has made deep cuts to staff at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that are alarming state officials and some Republican lawmakers.  

Imagine kids going hungry because as the Food Research and Action Center notes, millions of people throughout the country are struggling to make ends meet while Congress is cutting food programs that feed hungry kids.  SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, is among the cutbacks that provide school meals critical to children’s health and learning. More than 42 million people rely on SNAP to put food on the table.

The program not only reduces hunger. It improves health outcomes and reduces health care costs. Any cuts to SNAP harm children, older adults, and people with disabilities, who make up the majority of SNAP households.  Reducing SNAP benefits increases food insecurity and shifts the burden to local governments and charities who can’t fill the gap. Local economies are also harmed, especially in rural areas. Cuts to other food programs result in some schools not being able to serve free school meals affecting 12 million children.

The list of purge problems continues.  According to Kevin Caroll, author of a piece in The Dispatch in February and a former military intelligence officer and CIA case officer points out that investing in intelligence saves U.S. taxpayers’ money and American Lives.

There are eighteen agencies in the intelligence community augmented by civilian and military intelligence organizations. They prevent attacks by terrorists and vigilantes. They aid in diplomacy efforts through intelligence about foreign countries.

The economic costs to Americans are disconcerting. According to a Wall Street Journal report on price hikes due to tariffs, cars, fuel, building materials, appliances, beef, clothing, and computers will take a hit of up to a 10 to 45 percent increase. Cars, for example, will go up to $50,000 to 59, 000 while computers will rise above $1000.

Imagine how climate changes are rapidly imperiling the planet. As John Wesley Powell wrote after navigating the river at the Grand Canyon in 1896, “We are now ready to start our way down the Great Unknown. We have an unknown distance yet to run, an unknown river to explore. What falls there are, we know not; what rocks beset the channel, we know not; what walls rise over the river, we know not.”

It seems apt given an article by Yale Climate Connections that addresses the importance of climate change when we consider budget cuts like those taken at NOAA, FEMA and other federal agencies. The article states that “the impacts of climate change will be apocalyptic for many nations and people, particularly those that are not rich and White. People and communities with the least resources tend to be the first and hardest hit by climate change, not only because poorer people and communities are inherently more vulnerable to the impacts of any disaster, but also because the extremes induced by climate change tend to be worse in the tropics and subtropics, home to many poor nations.”

Global extreme weather events are becoming more common and increasingly worrisome.  Japan’s tsunami is not that far behind us and recent warnings of possible other lethal waves have occurred. The Santorini earthquakes and elsewhere are alarming along with fires that burned large swaths of Los Angeles.  We’ve seen photos of scary floods, starvation from droughts, and fluctuating temperatures globally. 

All these events have policy implications. As Thomas Edsall wrote in The New York Times on March 3rd, (edited for length) we should “Expect the elimination of thousands of jobs, the decimation of liberal institutions, reduced funding of safety nets, more homelessness, hunger and disease, poverty, financial starvation of universities and nongovernmental organizations, unannounced raids, unreliable data, an increasingly authoritarians worldwide, pervasive suspicion and revenge. Expect more suffering, fear, less security and happiness.” That’s not hyperbolic. The purges are impacting American and global economies, housing crises, absent insurance policies, agriculture and food supplies, not to mention morbidity and mortality.

Given deep worries about looming healthcare crises I must include the horrific impact of shutting down research and practices that relate to whether we live or die. Imagine this: you or someone you love is in treatment for cancer but will no longer be able to access experimental protocols or proven therapies, or your child has a chronic condition that requires inaccessible special care and protection, or measles, polio, and pandemics like those now rampant in other countries, return with a vengeance but there are no vaccines, or data, available.   

The time to address these likely catastrophes driven by narcissists, oligarchs, and bullies is now, whether in the halls of Congress, the media, on the streets, in town halls, and in voting booths. We can do this if we really try, and try we must.

                                                            # # #

Elayne Clift writes from Brattleboro, VT